FICHE CVE

CVE-2024-24563

Publiée le 2024-02-07 · Dernière modification le 2026-06-17

🇫🇷 EN BREF

Les contrats intelligents écrits dans le langage Vyper sont affectés car le compilateur autorise l'utilisation d'entiers signés comme index de tableaux. Un attaquant peut fournir un nombre négatif pour contourner les vérifications de limites prévues, ce qui pourrait lui permettre d'accéder à des données restreintes, de manipuler l'état du contrat ou de provoquer un déni de service. Cette action peut être exécutée à distance via le réseau, sans aucune authentification ni interaction de l'utilisateur.

CVSS 3.19.8 CRITIQUE
Type de faiblesse
Publiée2024-02-07
Dernière modification2026-06-17

DÉTAIL DU VECTEUR CVSS

Vecteur d'attaqueRéseau
Complexité d'attaqueFaible
Privilèges requisAucun
Interaction utilisateurAucune
PortéeInchangée
Impact sur la confidentialitéÉlevé
Impact sur l'intégritéÉlevé
Impact sur la disponibilitéÉlevé

RÉFÉRENCES

Description officielle du NVD (en anglais)

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. Arrays can be keyed by a signed integer, while they are defined for unsigned integers only. The typechecker doesn't throw when spotting the usage of an `int` as an index for an array. The typechecker allows the usage of signed integers to be used as indexes to arrays. The vulnerability is present in different forms in all versions, including `0.3.10`. For ints, the 2's complement representation is used. Because the array was declared very large, the bounds checking will pass Negative values will simply be represented as very large numbers. As of time of publication, a fixed version does not exist. There are three potential vulnerability classes: unpredictable behavior, accessing inaccessible elements and denial of service. Class 1: If it is possible to index an array with a negative integer without reverting, this is most likely not anticipated by the developer and such accesses can cause unpredictable behavior for the contract. Class 2: If a contract has an invariant in the form `assert index < x`, the developer will suppose that no elements on indexes `y | y >= x` are accessible. However, by using negative indexes, this can be bypassed. Class 3: If the index is dependent on the state of the contract, this poses a risk of denial of service. If the state of the contract can be manipulated in such way that the index will be forced to be negative, the array access can always revert (because most likely the array won't be declared extremely large). However, all these the scenarios are highly unlikely. Most likely behavior is a revert on the bounds check.